FM's rating:
1. Premise 7
2. Prose 10
3. Plot 6
4. Characters 9
5. Overall 8
4. Characters 9
5. Overall 8
Comments
(optional – but try to keep it under 3000 words!)
Atwood is
utterly brilliant. Her prose is second
to none. “The Handmaid’s Tale” is enough by itself to win her a place in the
history of literature, much like Harper Lee’s single work, “To Kill a
Mockingbird.” BUT. Atwood’s longer works, as brilliantly written
and plotted as they are, become tedious for me.
That’s because she is one of those authors – much like John Irving, who
I also very much admire but who can also be tedious - whose novels are
character-driven, not story-driven. They
tell the story through the process of
character development, so to speak.
This entails giving lots of “back-story” which, to me, always feels like
putting the “real” story on hold, while we take a long look at events in the
characters’ pasts. Sigh. Does this technique give the novel more
depth? Yes! Does it help us relate to the
characters? Yes! It does lots of good things. But it makes the book tedious for many of
us. I get so bogged down in the
histories of the characters that I have to alternate reading sections of the
book with reading sections of a different book that develops the characters through the process of telling the story.
No comments:
Post a Comment