Speaking of Sarah Duvall; what a superb portrayal of
professionalism and solid police work!
The admiration we might be expected to reserve for Fiona has shifted to
Sarah, and I find myself rooting for this “supporting role” character over the
protagonist. Is this intentional? Are we being set up to find that Duvall is
deeply flawed after all? That would be
interesting. At Sarah’s introduction to
the reader, it is mentioned that she is Black, but then almost carefully
avoided for some reason. The combination
of traits reminded me of Queen Latifah’s role in the movie Stranger Than
Fiction, in which the actress plays a very strong-minded, down-to-earth
assistant to Emma Thompson’s portrayal of the fiction writer (excellent
movie! See it if you haven’t!) I love Queen Latifah, and she would fill the
role in this book beautifully!
Writing idiosyncrasies continue to stick out glaringly. I don’t like to criticize these too harshly,
because they don’t really mar the book that much, but the observation that So-and-so
“pulled a face” is overused to the point of annoyance. Maybe in McDermid’s Scotland, “pulling a
face” is more than just a quaint colloquialism, I don’t know. I’m not even sure I can pin down what it
means with any precision. I just hope
she’s finished using it.
Fiona’s inability to remain professional in the light of
danger to her Significant Other, Kit, continues to be grating. The author probably means to show how
vulnerably human Fiona is, which is
fine, but it has become more than that – it has become a glaring flaw in the psychologically
adept protagonist’s own psychological makeup.
Steve points out to her that her judgment is being compromised; “‘If
this didn’t touch Kit, you’d be the first to say we should avoid giving this
killer the oxygen of publicity.’ ‘Yes,
Steve, I probably would,’ Fiona said angrily.
‘But it does touch Kit, and I owe him far more than I owe the City of
London Police.’” Being willfully
illogical doesn’t endear her to us. Oh
well, there are still 150 long pages left to redeem our attachment to her…
I like a colorful metaphor as much as anyone;
Ray Bradbury, Kurt Vonnegut and Dean Koontz, to give three examples, have made
me pause mid-paragraph many times to admire a particularly well-constructed
metaphor or comparison. This author is
not as adept as some. (Again, I feel so
petty pointing these things out, because there is so much about McDermid’s
prose that is good. But these things
stick out, at least to an American Southwesterner like myself.) Example: “Steve Preston, claiming there was
more to life than the job? It was about
as likely as Bart Simpson joining the diplomatic service.” Hmmm. Maybe
in some parts of Scotland, Bart Simpson is known chiefly for his lack of
diplomatic skills; again, I don’t know. If
so, I think maybe a lot of Scots may be missing the point of the
characterization of Bart Simpson. Maybe
The Hulk would have been a better choice for this metaphor?
Next Week: Chapters 44-Epilogue
Before vampires became sympathetic characters with their own alternate worlds, complete with vampire coffee shops and vampire politics, they used to be bad guys, scary not sexy, and they preferred wreaking havoc in horror novels rather than exuding tortured sensitivity in YA coming-of-age fiction. Fortunately, we don’t need to go all the way back to Dracula and Boris Karloff to remember those halcyon days: we have Stephen King’s ’Salem’s Lot, from 1975. - Booklist
Week 1: Chapters 1-4
Next Week: Chapters 44-Epilogue
October’s book of the month; “'Salem's Lot,” by the incomparable Stephen King!
Stephen King's second
book, 'Salem's Lot (1975)--about the slow takeover of an insular hamlet
called Jerusalem's Lot by a vampire patterned after Bram Stoker's Dracula--has
two elements that he also uses to good effect in later novels: a small American
town . . . and a mixed bag of rational, goodhearted people, including a writer,
who band together to fight that evil. Simply
taken as a contemporary vampire novel, 'Salem's Lot is great fun to read,
and has been very influential in the horror genre. But it's also a sly piece of
social commentary… - Amazon.com Review
Before vampires became sympathetic characters with their own alternate worlds, complete with vampire coffee shops and vampire politics, they used to be bad guys, scary not sexy, and they preferred wreaking havoc in horror novels rather than exuding tortured sensitivity in YA coming-of-age fiction. Fortunately, we don’t need to go all the way back to Dracula and Boris Karloff to remember those halcyon days: we have Stephen King’s ’Salem’s Lot, from 1975. - Booklist
Week 1: Chapters 1-4
(First post, 10-10-14)
Week 2: Chapters 5-9
Week 3: Chapters 10-13
Week 4: Chapters 14-Epilogue
Week 3: Chapters 10-13
Week 4: Chapters 14-Epilogue
No comments:
Post a Comment